Finbuckle.
Data isolation is one of the most important considerations in a multitenant app. Whether each tenant has its own database, a shared database, or a hybrid approach can make a significant different in app design. Finbuckle.MultiTenant supports each of these models by associating a connection string with each tenant.
If each tenant uses a separate database then the ConnectionString tenant info
property can be used directly in the OnConfiguring method of the database
context class to configure the connection. The TenantInfo instance can be
injected into the database context using either an ITenantInfo or custom
ITenantInfo implementation (as configured with AddMultiTenant<TTenantInfo>) parameter
on the database context constructor.
public class MyAppDbContext : DbContext
{
private TTenantInfo TenantInfo { get; set; }
public MyAppDbContext(MyTenantInfo tenantInfo)
{
// DI will pass in the tenant info for the current request.
// ITenantInfo is also injectable.
TenantInfo = tenantInfo;
}
protected override void OnConfiguring(DbContextOptionsBuilder optionsBuilder)
{
// Use the connection string to connect to the per-tenant database.
optionsBuilder.UseSqlServer(TenantInfo.ConnectionString);
}
...
}
This approach does not require the added complexity described below for a shared database approach, but does come with its own complexity in operating and maintaining a larger number of database instances and infrastructure.
In shared database scenarios it is important to make sure that queries and commands for a tenant do not affect the data belonging to other tenants. Finbuckle.MultiTenant handles this automatically and removes the need to sprinkle "where" clauses all over an app. Internally a "shadow" tenant ID property is added (or used if already present) to multitenant entity types and managed as the database context is used. It also performs validation and related options for handling null or mismatched tenants.
Finbuckle.MultiTenant provides two different ways to utilize this behavior in a database context class:
IMultiTenantDbContext and used the helper methods as
described below, orMultiTenantDbContext which handles the details for you.The first option is more complex, but provides enhanced flexibility and allows existing database context classes (which may derive from a base class) to utilize per-tenant data isolation. The second option is easier, but provides less flexibility. These approaches are both explained further below.
Regardless of how the db context is configured, the context will need to know which entity types should be treated as multitenant
(i.e. which entity types are to be isolated per tenant) When the db context is initialized, a shadow property named TenantId is added to the data model for designated entity types. This property is used internally to filter all requests and commands. If there already is a defined string property named "TenantId" then it will be used.
There are two ways to designate an entity type as multitenant:
[MultiTenant] data attributeIsMultiTenant.Entity types not designated via one of these methods are not isolated per-tenant all instances are shared across all tenants.
The [MultiTenant] attribute designates a class to be isolated per-tenant when
it is used as an entity type in a database context:
// Tenants will only see their own blog posts.
[MultiTenant]
public class BlogPost
{
...
}
// Roles will be the same for all tenants.
public class Roles
{
...
}
public class BloggingDbContext : MultiTenantDbContext
{
public DbSet<BlogPost> BlogPosts { get; set; } // This will be multitenant!
public DbSet<Roles> Roles { get; set; } // Not multitenant!
}
Database context classes derived from MultiTenantDbContext will automatically
respect the [MultiTenant] attribute. Otherwise a database context class can
be configured to respect the attribute by calling ConfigureMultiTenant in the
OnModelCreating method.
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder builder)
{
// Not needed if db context derives from MultiTenantDbContext
builder.ConfigureMultiTenant();
}
The fluent API entity type builder extension method IsMultiTenant can be called in OnModelCreating to provide the
multitenant functionality for entity types:
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder builder)
{
// Configure an entity type to be multitenant.
builder.Entity<MyEntityType>().IsMultiTenant();
}
This approach is more flexible than using the [MultiTenant] attribute because
it can be used for types which do not have the attribute, e.g. from another assembly.
IsMultiTenant() returns an MultiTenantEntityTypeBuilder instance which enables further multitenant configuration of the entity type via AdjustKey,AdjustIndex, AdjustIndexes, and AdjustUniqueIndexes. See Keys and Indexes for more details.
IsMultiTenant and the [MultiTenant] attribute use a query filter for data isolation and will automatically merge its query filter with an existing query filter is one is present. For that reason, if the type to be multitenant has a existing query filter, IsMultiTenant and ConfigureMultiTenant should be called after the existing query filter is configured:
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder builder)
{
// set a global query filter, e.g. to support soft delete
builder.Entity<MyEntityType>().HasQueryFilter(p => !p.IsDeleted);
// Configure an entity type to be multitenant (will merge with existing call to HasQueryFilter)
builder.Entity<MyEntityType>().IsMultiTenant();
}
This approach is more flexible than deriving from MultiTenantDbContext, but
needs more configuration. It requires implementing IMultiTenantDbContext and
following a strict convention of helper method calls.
Start by adding the Finbuckle.MultiTenant.EntityFrameworkCore package to the project:
dotnet add package Finbuckle.MultiTenant.EntityFrameworkCore
Next, implement IMultiTenantDbContext on the context. These interface properties ensure that the extension methods will have the information needed to provide proper data isolation.
public class MyDbContext : DbContext, IMultiTenantDbContext
{
...
public ITenantInfo TenantInfo { get; }
public TenantMismatchMode TenantMismatchMode { get; }
public TenantNotSetMode TenantNotSetMode { get; }
...
}
The db context will need to ensure that these properties haves values, e.g. through constructors, setters, or default values.
Finally, call the library extension methods as described below. This requires overriding the OnModelCreating, SaveChanges, and SaveChangesAsync methods.
In OnModelCreating use the EntityTypeBuilder fluent API extension method IsMultiTenant to designate entity types as multitenant. Call ConfigureMultiTenant on the ModelBuilder to configure each entity type marked with the [MultiTenant] data attribute. This is only needed if using the attribute and internally uses the IsMultiTenant fluent API. Make sure to call the base class OnModelCreating method if necessary, such as if inheriting from IdentityDbContext.
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder builder)
{
// If necessary call the base class method.
// Recommended to be called first.
base.OnModelCreating(builder);
// Configure all entity types marked with the [MultiTenant] data attribute
builder.ConfigureMultiTenant();
// Configure an entity type to be multitenant.
builder.Entity<MyEntityType>().IsMultiTenant();
}
In SaveChanges and SaveChangesAsync call the IMultiTenantDbContext extension method EnforceMultiTenant before calling the base class method. This ensures proper data isolation and behavior for TenantMismatchMode and TenantNotSetMode.
public override int SaveChanges(bool acceptAllChangesOnSuccess)
{
this.EnforceMultiTenant();
return base.SaveChanges(acceptAllChangesOnSuccess);
}
public override async Task<int> SaveChangesAsync(bool acceptAllChangesOnSuccess,
CancellationToken cancellationToken = default(CancellationToken))
{
this.EnforceMultiTenant();
return await base.SaveChangesAsync(acceptAllChangesOnSuccess, cancellationToken);
}
Now, whenever this db context is used it will only set and query records for the current tenant.
This approach is easier bit requires inheriting from MultiTenantDbContext which
may not always be possible. It is simply a pre-configured implementation of
IMultiTenantDbContext with the helper methods as described below in
(Adding MultiTenant Functionality to an Existing DbContext)
[#adding-multitenant-functionality-to-an-existing-dbcontext]
Start by adding the Finbuckle.MultiTenant.EntityFrameworkCore package to the project:
dotnet add package Finbuckle.MultiTenant.EntityFrameworkCore
The MultiTenantDbContext has two constructors which should be called from any derived db context. Make sure to forward the ITenantInfo and, if applicable the DbContextOptions<T> into the base constructor.
public class BloggingDbContext : MultiTenantDbContext
{
public BloggingDbContext(ITenantInfo tenantInfo) : base(tenantInfo) { }
public BloggingDbContext(ITenantInfo tenantInfo, DbContextOptions<BloggingDbContext> options) :
base(tenantInfo, options) { }
public DbSet<Blog> Blogs { get; set; }
public DbSet<Post> Posts { get; set; }
}
If relying on the ConnectionString property of the TenantInfo then the db context will need to configures itself in its OnConfiguring method using its inherited ConnectionString property:
public class BloggingDbContext : MultiTenantDbContext
{
...
protected override void OnConfiguring(DbContextOptionsBuilder optionsBuilder)
{
optionsBuilder.UseSqlServer(TenantInfo.ConnectionString);\
}
...
}
If the derived db context overrides OnModelCreating is it recommended that the base class OnModelCreating method is called last so that the multitenant query filters are not overwritten.
public class BloggingDbContext : MultiTenantDbContext
{
...
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
// set a global query filter, e.g. to support soft delete
modelBuilder.Entity<Post>().HasQueryFilter(p => !p.IsDeleted);
// call the base library implementation AFTER the above
base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);
}
...
}
And that's it. Whenever this db context is used it will only set and query records for the current tenant.
When using a shared database context based on IMultiTenantDbContext it is
simple extend into a hybrid approach simply by assigning some tenants to a separate
shared database (or its own completely isolated database) via the tenant info
connection string property.
Given that a multitenant db context usually requires a tenant to function, design time instantiation can be challenging.
By default for things like migrations and command line tools Entity Framework core attempts to create an instance of the context
using dependency injection, however usually no valid tenant exists in these cases and DI fails.
For this reason it is recommended to use a design time factory wherein a dummy ITenantInfo is constructed with the desired connection string and passed to the db context constructor.
When registering the db context as a service in ASP.NET Core it is important to take into account whether the connection string and/or provider will vary per-tenant. If so, it is recommended to set the connection string and provider in the OnConfiguring db context method as described above rather than in the AddDbContext service registration method.
Added entities are automatically associated with the current TenantInfo. If an entity is associated with a different TenantInfo then a MultiTenantException is thrown in SaveChanges or SaveChangesAsync.
// Add a blog for a tenant.
Blog myBlog = new Blog{ Title = "My Blog" };;
var db = new BloggingDbContext(myTenantInfo, null);
db.Blogs.Add(myBlog));
db.SaveChanges();
// Try to add the same blog to a different tenant.
db = new BloggingDbContext(yourTenantInfo, null);
db.Blogs.Add(myBlog);
await db.SaveChangesAsync(); // Throws MultiTenantException.
Queries only return results associated to the TenantInfo.
// Will only return "My Blog".
var db = new BloggingDbContext(myTenantInfo, null);
var tenantBlog = db.Blogs.First();
// Will only return "Your Blog".
db = new BloggingDbContext(yourTenantInfo, null);
var tenantBlogs = db.Blogs.First();
IgnoreQueryFilters can be used to bypass the filter for LINQ queries.
// TenantBlogs will contain all blogs, regardless of tenant.
var db = new BloggingDbContext(myTenantInfo, null);
var tenantBlogs = db.Blogs.IgnoreQueryFilters().ToList();
The query filter is applied only at the root level of a query. Any entity classes loaded via Include or ThenInclude are not filtered, but if all entity classes involved in a query have the [MultiTenant] attribute then all results are associated to the same tenant.
Updated or deleted entities are checked to make sure they are associated with the TenantInfo. If an entity is associated with a different TenantInfo then a MultiTenantException is thrown in SaveChanges or SaveChangesAsync.
// Add a blog for a tenant.
Blog myBlog = new Blog{ Title = "My Blog" };
var db = new BloggingDbContext(myTenantInfo);
db.Blogs.Add(myBlog));
db.SaveChanges();
// Modify and attach the same blog to a different tenant.
db = new BloggingDbContext(yourTenantInfo, null);
db.Blogs.Attach(myBlog);
myBlog.Title = "My Changed Blog";
await db.SaveChangesAsync(); // Throws MultiTenantException.
db.Blogs.Remove(myBlog);
await db.SaveChangesAsync(); // Throws MultiTenantException.
When configuring a multitenant entity type it is often useful to include the implicit TenantId column in the primary key and/or indexes. The MultiTenantEntityTypeBuilder instance returned from IsMultiTenant() provides the following methods for this purpose:
AdjustKey(IMutableKey, ModelBuilder) - Alters the existing defined key to add the implicit TenantId. Note that this will also impact entities with a dependent foreign key and may add an implicit Tenant Id there as well.AdjustIndex(IMutableIndex) - Alters an existing index include the implicit TenantId.AdjustIndexes() - Alters all existing indexes to include the implicit TenantId.AdjustUniqueIndexes() - Alters only all existing unique indexes to include te implicit TenantId.protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder builder)
{
// Configure an entity type to be multitenant, adjust the existing keys and indexes
var key = builder.Entity<Blog>().Metadata.GetKeys().First();
builder.Entity<MyEntityType>().IsMultiTenant().AdjustKey(key, builder).AdjustIndexes();
}
Normally Finbuckle.MultiTenant will automatically coordinate the TenantId property of each entity. However in certain situations the TenantId can be manually set.
By default attempting to add or update an entity with a different TenantId property throws a MultiTenantException during a call to SaveChanges or SaveChangesAsync. This behavior can be changed by setting the TenantMismatchMode property on the database context:
MultiTenantException is thrown (default).TenantId.TenantId is overwritten to match the database context's current TenantInfo.If the TenantId on an entity is manually set to null the default behavior is to overwrite the TenantId for added entities or to throw a MultiTenantException for updated entities. This occurs during a call to SaveChanges or SaveChangesAsync. This behavior can be changed by setting the `TenantNotSetMode' property on the database context:
TenantId will be overwritten to match the database context's current TenantInfo. For updated entities a MultiTenantException is thrown (default).TenantId is overwritten to match the database context's current TenantInfo.